Files
josh-sync/docs/adr/011-linearize-fallback-reverse.md

59 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Normal View History

# ADR-011: Linearize Fallback for Reverse Sync
**Status:** Accepted
**Date:** 2026-03
## Context
Josh-proxy rejects reverse sync pushes when the subrepo history contains merge commits whose parents it cannot map through the filter. This happens when:
1. A long-lived branch (e.g., `stage`) is merged into `main` via a merge commit
2. That branch contains auto-sync merge commits or criss-cross merges with `main`
3. Josh encounters the merge commit, tries to map both parents through the filter, and fails with a 500 error
This is a legitimate subrepo workflow — teams merge staging branches into main regularly. The sync tool should handle it without requiring teams to change their Git workflow.
### Alternatives considered
1. **Squash all commits into one**: Simple but destroys all commit granularity.
2. **Rewrite subrepo history**: Breaks josh's SHA mapping, forces all developers to re-clone.
3. **Linearize: cherry-pick regular commits, squash only merges**: Preserves individual commit granularity; only merge commits lose their multi-parent structure.
## Decision
When the direct push through josh-proxy fails, fall back to option 4: linearize the history by cherry-picking onto the josh-filtered base.
### How it works
1. Direct `git push` through josh-proxy is attempted first (existing behavior)
2. If it fails, create a temporary branch from `mono-filtered/<branch>`
3. Walk human commits (oldest-first, bot commits excluded) from the ancestry path:
- **Regular commits** (≤1 parent): `git cherry-pick <sha>` — preserves author, date, and message
- **Merge commits** (>1 parent): `git cherry-pick -m 1 <sha>` — applies the merge's diff relative to its first parent as a single commit
4. If cherry-pick conflicts (rare — usually due to ordering issues), fall back to `git diff | git apply` with the original author metadata
5. Push the linearized branch through josh-proxy
6. PR body includes a note explaining that merge commits were squashed
### What is preserved
- Individual non-merge commits (author, date, message, diff)
- The net effect of each merge commit (as a squashed single commit)
- The original commit list in the PR body for reference
### What is lost
- The multi-parent structure of merge commits (they become single-parent)
- The distinction between "changes introduced by the merge" vs "changes from each parent" — the merge is represented as its diff from first parent
## Consequences
**Positive:**
- Reverse sync no longer gets stuck on merge commits — handles the common case automatically
- Non-merge commits retain full granularity (no unnecessary squashing)
- Subrepo history is untouched — no rewriting, no broken sync relationship
- The PR body documents when linearization was used, so reviewers know
**Negative:**
- Merge commit semantics are lost on the monorepo side (they appear as regular commits)
- Adds complexity to the reverse sync path (two code paths: direct push and linearize fallback)