Files
josh-sync/docs/adr/011-linearize-fallback-reverse.md
SBPro d6f334b861 Add linearize fallback for reverse sync and workflow guide (v1.3)
When josh-proxy rejects a reverse sync push due to unmappable merge
commits, fall back to linearizing: cherry-pick regular commits
individually, squash only the merge commits via cherry-pick -m 1.

Also adds a recommended Git workflow section to the guide explaining
where cross-branch merges should happen (monorepo) vs feature work
(subrepo), and expands troubleshooting for the "josh rejected push"
error with root cause analysis and prevention advice.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-17 12:48:17 +03:00

3.9 KiB

ADR-011: Linearize Fallback for Reverse Sync

Status: Accepted Date: 2026-03

Context

Josh-proxy rejects reverse sync pushes when the subrepo history contains merge commits whose parents it cannot map through the filter. This happens when:

  1. A long-lived branch (e.g., stage) is merged into main via a merge commit
  2. That branch contains auto-sync merge commits or criss-cross merges with main
  3. Josh encounters the merge commit, tries to map both parents through the filter, and fails with a 500 error

This is a legitimate subrepo workflow — teams merge staging branches into main regularly. The sync tool should handle it without requiring teams to change their Git workflow.

Alternatives considered

  1. Fail and log: The pre-v1.3 behavior. Leaves the sync stuck until someone manually intervenes. Bad for unattended cron-based sync.

  2. Squash all commits into one: Create a single commit-tree with the diff between josh-filtered base and subrepo HEAD. Simple but destroys all commit granularity — 10 unrelated commits appear as one blob on the monorepo PR.

  3. Rewrite subrepo history: Rebase or filter-branch the subrepo to remove problematic merges. Breaks the sync relationship with the monorepo (josh's SHA mapping becomes invalid) and forces all developers to re-clone.

  4. Linearize: cherry-pick regular commits, squash only merges: Walk the human commits in order, cherry-pick non-merge commits as-is, and use cherry-pick -m 1 for merge commits. Preserves individual commit granularity for regular commits; only the problematic merge commits lose their multi-parent structure.

Decision

When the direct push through josh-proxy fails, fall back to option 4: linearize the history by cherry-picking onto the josh-filtered base.

How it works

  1. Direct git push through josh-proxy is attempted first (existing behavior)
  2. If it fails, create a temporary branch from mono-filtered/<branch>
  3. Walk human commits (oldest-first, bot commits excluded) from the ancestry path:
    • Regular commits (≤1 parent): git cherry-pick <sha> — preserves author, date, and message
    • Merge commits (>1 parent): git cherry-pick -m 1 <sha> — applies the merge's diff relative to its first parent as a single commit
  4. If cherry-pick conflicts (rare — usually due to ordering issues), fall back to git diff | git apply with the original author metadata
  5. Push the linearized branch through josh-proxy
  6. PR body includes a note explaining that merge commits were squashed

What is preserved

  • Individual non-merge commits (author, date, message, diff)
  • The net effect of each merge commit (as a squashed single commit)
  • The original commit list in the PR body for reference

What is lost

  • The multi-parent structure of merge commits (they become single-parent)
  • The distinction between "changes introduced by the merge" vs "changes from each parent" — the merge is represented as its diff from first parent

Consequences

Positive:

  • Reverse sync no longer gets stuck on merge commits — handles the common case automatically
  • Non-merge commits retain full granularity (no unnecessary squashing)
  • Subrepo history is untouched — no rewriting, no broken sync relationship
  • The PR body documents when linearization was used, so reviewers know

Negative:

  • Merge commit semantics are lost on the monorepo side (they appear as regular commits)
  • If a merge commit's changes conflict with a prior cherry-picked commit during linearization, the diff-apply fallback may produce a subtly different result than the original merge resolution
  • Adds complexity to the reverse sync path (two code paths: direct push and linearize fallback)

Risk mitigation:

  • The direct push is always tried first — linearization only activates when josh rejects the push
  • The monorepo PR is still reviewed by humans before merging
  • The original commit SHAs are listed in the PR body for cross-referencing